How Zoning Laws Contribute to the Housing Crisis

Introduction

The housing crisis in the United States is not simply the result of market forces or individual choices, it is deeply shaped by policies that govern land use and development. Among the most significant of these policies are zoning laws, the regulations that determine what types of buildings can be constructed, where they can be built, and how land can be used. While zoning was originally designed to separate industrial and residential areas for health and safety reasons, over time it has become one of the biggest barriers to affordable housing.

Understanding how zoning laws contribute to the housing crisis is essential for anyone concerned about homelessness, housing insecurity, and the broader affordability challenges facing American cities today.

A Brief History of Zoning in the United States

Zoning in America began in the early 20th century, with New York City adopting the first comprehensive zoning ordinance in 1916. These laws were intended to protect property values, reduce congestion, and separate incompatible land uses. By 1926, the Supreme Court upheld zoning as constitutional in the landmark case Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., giving cities and towns the power to regulate land use broadly.

However, zoning has always carried unintended consequences. Early zoning laws often reinforced segregation by excluding lower-income families and communities of color from certain neighborhoods. While overtly racist zoning is now illegal, exclusionary practices persist in subtler forms, often through restrictions on building types and density.

Single-Family Zoning and Its Consequences

One of the most controversial aspects of zoning is single-family zoning—laws that allow only detached, single-family homes on a given piece of land. These restrictions, which dominate much of suburban and even urban America, prevent the construction of duplexes, triplexes, and small apartment buildings.

The consequences are significant:

• They limit housing supply, driving up prices.
• They exclude renters and lower-income households from high-opportunity neighborhoods.
• They perpetuate racial and economic segregation, because wealthier households are more likely to afford single-family homes.

In cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Minneapolis, between 70 and 80 percent of residential land is zoned for single-family use. This severely restricts the potential for building new, affordable housing where people most want and need to live.

Parking Requirements and Development Costs

Another zoning barrier comes in the form of minimum parking requirements. Many cities mandate that developers provide a set number of parking spaces for each housing unit, regardless of the actual demand for parking. These requirements raise the cost of development and reduce the number of units that can be built.

Studies have shown that constructing a single structured parking spot can add tens of thousands of dollars to the cost of a housing unit. In dense, transit-rich areas, these requirements often make little sense, yet they remain a common part of zoning codes.

Density Restrictions and Height Limits

Beyond single-family zoning and parking requirements, cities often impose strict density and height limits that restrict how many units can be built on a given site. Even when demand for housing is high, these regulations keep supply artificially low.

Height limits in particular can prevent the development of multifamily housing near job centers, transit hubs, and downtown areas. This drives up rents, forces people to commute longer distances, and worsens traffic and pollution.

Zoning and Homelessness

While zoning is often discussed in terms of affordability, its impact on homelessness is just as profound. By limiting housing supply and driving up rents, restrictive zoning contributes to displacement and housing instability. Research has consistently shown a strong correlation between high housing costs and rates of homelessness.

Cities with restrictive zoning tend to have higher rates of unsheltered homelessness because there are simply not enough affordable units to meet the need. Loosening zoning restrictions can therefore be a powerful tool in reducing homelessness and preventing families from falling into housing insecurity.

Reform Efforts Across the Country

In recent years, there has been growing recognition that restrictive zoning fuels the housing crisis. A number of states and cities have begun to pursue reforms:

• Minneapolis became the first major city to eliminate single-family zoning in 2019, allowing duplexes and triplexes citywide.
• Oregon passed a statewide law allowing multi-unit housing on land previously restricted to single-family homes.
• California has advanced several measures, including Senate Bill 9, which allows property owners to split lots and build additional units.

These reforms have been controversial, facing opposition from homeowners concerned about property values, neighborhood character, and local control. But they represent a shift in how policymakers think about zoning as part of the solution to the housing crisis.

The Role of Advocacy and Community Action

Changing zoning laws is not just a technical exercise—it requires sustained advocacy and community engagement. Grassroots coalitions, housing justice organizations, and nonprofit groups have been instrumental in pushing for reforms.

For individuals and communities, this means:

• Educating others about how zoning contributes to affordability challenges.
• Supporting local policies that encourage diverse housing types.
• Partnering with advocacy groups that promote fair housing and equitable development.

At the same time, there is an opportunity for businesses, including cause-based apparel brands like Cherry Willow Apparel, to raise awareness about these issues. By highlighting the connection between housing policy and homelessness, brands can help foster dialogue and action at both the local and national level.

Conclusion

The housing crisis is complex, but zoning laws are a central piece of the puzzle. Single-family zoning, parking mandates, density restrictions, and height limits all serve to constrain housing supply, drive up costs, and push people into housing insecurity.

Reforming zoning is not a silver bullet, but it is one of the most impactful steps cities can take to expand affordable housing and reduce homelessness. The growing movement to rethink land use policies reflects a recognition that our communities must be more inclusive, equitable, and responsive to the realities of housing demand.

The question is not whether zoning contributes to the housing crisis... it clearly does. The real question is whether we will summon the political will to reform these outdated policies and create a future where safe, stable housing is accessible to all.

‍